英國大學敦促結束毒品零容忍,轉而把重點放在減少危害上
UK universities urged to end drugs zero tolerance and focus on harm reduction
譯文簡介
“我要祝賀毒品贏得了毒品戰(zhàn)爭。”——雅虎報道。
正文翻譯
UK universities urged to end drugs zero tolerance and focus on harm reduction
英國大學敦促結束毒品零容忍,轉而把重點放在減少危害上

(Jeni Larmour, 18, who died on her first day at Newcastle University in 2020, after consuming a lethal combination of alcohol and ketamine.)
(2020年,18歲的珍妮·拉莫爾在進入紐卡斯爾大學的第一天就去世了,死因是酒精和氯胺酮的致命組合。)
新聞:
UK universities are being urged to ditch a zero-tolerance approach to drug use and focus instead on public health and harm reduction, with drug testing and non-judgmental support for students seeking help.
英國大學被敦促放棄對吸毒的零容忍態(tài)度,轉而關注公共衛(wèi)生和減少危害,為尋求幫助的學生提供毒品測試和非評判性支持。
The warning came as new research found students are less likely to use drugs than those of the same age group in the general population. Of the minority that do, more than two out of five would like to reduce their use.
這一警告是伴隨一項新的研究發(fā)現(xiàn),與一般人群中同年齡段的人相比,學生吸毒的可能性更小而發(fā)出的。在少數(shù)吸毒的學生中,超過五分之二的人希望減少攝入。
Experts remain concerned that a zero-tolerance approach still deployed on some campuses, including fines, suspensions and expulsions, does little to reduce drug use and could deter students from coming forward for help.
專家們?nèi)匀粨模恍┬@仍然采取零容忍的方式,包括罰款、停學和開除,這對減少吸毒幾乎沒有作用,而且可能會阻止學生主動尋求幫助。
Almost one in five (18%) out of 4,000 students who took part in a poll for Universities UK (UUK) – the organization that represents 142 higher education providers – told researchers they had used drugs in the past, while one in eight (12%) had used drugs in the past year.
“英國大學”是一個代表142所高等教育機構的組織,在4000名參加調(diào)查的學生中,近五分之一(18%)的人告訴研究人員,他們過去曾使用過毒品,而八分之一(12%)的人在過去一年中使用過毒品。
Of those who had ever taken drugs, the most commonly used in the past year were cannabis (53%), cocaine (8%), prescxtion drugs (7%), ketamine (6%) and ecstasy (4%).
在曾經(jīng)吸毒的人中,去年最常用的是大麻(53%)、可卡因(8%)、處方藥(7%)、氯胺酮(6%)和搖頭丸(4%)。
Among non-students, almost 18% of 16- to 24-year-olds in England and Wales reported drug use in the year up to March 2023, according to the Office for National Statistics, while in Scotland, 23.5% of the same age group had used drugs in the year prior to being surveyed.
英國國家統(tǒng)計局的數(shù)據(jù)顯示,在非學生群體中,在截至2023年3月的一年中,英格蘭和威爾士16歲至24歲的年輕人中有近18%的人報告使用過毒品。而在蘇格蘭,23.5%的同年齡段人群在接受調(diào)查前一年使用過毒品。
According to UUK, only one in five students who have used drugs in the past 12 months have asked for support from their institution. Of those students who did seek support, nearly half (46%) said their university’s drug policy was a barrier, while more than a third (37%) feared the consequences of coming forward.
根據(jù)英國聯(lián)合大學的數(shù)據(jù),在過去的12個月里,只有五分之一的吸毒學生向?qū)W校尋求過支持。在那些尋求幫助的學生中,近一半的人說他們學校的毒品政策是一個障礙,而超過三分之一的人擔心站出來承認的后果。
Jeni Larmour, 18, of Newtownhamilton in Northern Ireland, died in October 2020 on her first day at Newcastle University after consuming a lethal combination of alcohol and ketamine given to her “by another”, according to a coroner.
據(jù)一名驗尸官稱,來自北愛爾蘭紐頓漢密爾頓的18歲女孩珍妮·拉莫爾于2020年10月在紐卡斯爾大學的第一天死亡,死因是攝入了“另一個人”給她的致命酒精和氯胺酮。
Her mother, Sandra Larmour, welcomed the report and said her own views on drug policy had changed. Where once she might have backed zero tolerance, she now favours educating and supporting students, though she said universities should never condone drug use.
她的母親桑德拉·拉莫爾對這份報告表示歡迎,并表示她自己對毒品政策的看法已經(jīng)改變。她曾經(jīng)可能支持零容忍,但現(xiàn)在她支持教育和支持學生,盡管她說大學永遠不應該容忍吸毒。
“If you tell a bunch of teenagers ‘don’t do something’, you’re on a hiding to nothing. Anybody that’s got children knows that – they’re going to go out and do it,” Larmour said.
拉莫爾說:“如果你告訴一群青少年'不要做某事',你就會一無所獲。任何有孩子的人都知道這一點——他們會出去做這件事的。
“But if you’re doing something in an open and informed manner, that can only help. If you’ve got people there with insight, knowledge and professional experience that can give them guidance on it, and they feel they can come forward, that’s a very positive step.”
“但如果你以公開和知情的方式做某事,那只會有所幫助。如果你在那里找到了有洞察力、知識和專業(yè)經(jīng)驗的人,可以給他們提供指導,他們覺得自己可以挺身站出來,這是非常積極的一步?!?br />
The SafeCourse charity, which was set up to promote harm reduction policies on UK campuses, welcomed UUK’s new frxwork for action. Its founder, Hilton Mervis, whose son Daniel died of an accidental overdose, said a zero-tolerance approach may have discouraged him from seeking help because of fear of expulsion.
為在英國校園推廣減少傷害政策而設立的安全課程慈善機構對英國新的行動框架表示歡迎。它的創(chuàng)始人希爾頓·默維斯的兒子丹尼爾因意外服藥過量而死亡。他說,零容忍的態(tài)度可能使他因為害怕被驅(qū)逐而不愿尋求幫助。
“Drugs left a hole in my family’s life because Daniel was failed by zero-tolerance policies,” he said, adding that the college now has a “clear harm reduction policy which puts the safety and wellbeing of their students first.
他說:“毒品在我的家庭生活中留下了一個空洞,因為丹尼爾沒有遵守零容忍政策?!彼a充說,學院現(xiàn)在有一個“明確的減少傷害政策,把學生的安全和福祉放在第一位?!?br />
“Yet many universities continue to declare zero tolerance on drugs. In practice, this means zero action. This puts students at risk. The time has come for universities to adopt active, student-led harm reduction approaches.”
“然而,許多大學繼續(xù)宣稱對毒品零容忍。在實踐中,這意味著零行動。這讓學生處于危險之中?,F(xiàn)在是大學采取積極的、以學生為主導的減少傷害方法的時候了。”
The UUK report, Enabling student health and success: tackling supply and demand for drugs and improving harm reduction, published on Tuesday, also calls on universities to promote and inform students of drug checking services. “Students often do not know the contents and strength of illicit drugs at the point of purchase,” it says.
本周二公布的這份名為《促進學生健康和成功:解決毒品供求問題,減少危害》的報告還呼吁大學推廣并告知學生毒品檢查服務。報告稱:“學生在購買時往往不知道違禁藥物的成分和強度。
“The consequences of this can be fatal. Drug checking provides an independent service which encourages students to have any substances of concern tested by chemists, and the results discussed during a consultation with a health professional.”
“這樣的后果可能是致命的。藥物檢查提供了一項獨立的服務,鼓勵學生讓化學家檢測任何令人擔憂的物質(zhì),并在咨詢健康專業(yè)人員時討論結果?!?br />
It also suggests a sliding scale of warnings of increasing severity for repeat incidents over an agreed timefrx to ensure a university is not perceived as permissive about the use of drugs.
該報告還建議,在商定的時間框架內(nèi),對重復發(fā)生的事件進行逐步加重的警告,以確保一所大學不會被視為縱容使用毒品。
Larmour urged parents whose children are preparing to go off to university in the autumn to talk to their child. “Make sure that you’re open and honest with them.” To youngsters about to leave home, she said: “Be aware of your surroundings. Be aware of who your friends are. Think before you do anything.
拉莫爾敦促那些準備在秋天上大學的孩子的父母和他們的孩子談談。“確保你對他們是開放和誠實的。”對于即將離家的年輕人,她說:“注意你周圍的環(huán)境。知道誰是你的朋友。三思而后行。
“I miss Jeni every day of my life. I think about her all the time. Everything I do, I do it for one reason. That’s to keep her name alive, to keep her name on people’s lips, to keep her memory alive.”
“我每天都在想念珍妮。我一直在想她。我做的每件事,都只有一個原因。這是為了讓她的名字流傳下去,讓她的名字留在人們的嘴邊,讓她的記憶永存?!?br />
英國大學敦促結束毒品零容忍,轉而把重點放在減少危害上

(Jeni Larmour, 18, who died on her first day at Newcastle University in 2020, after consuming a lethal combination of alcohol and ketamine.)
(2020年,18歲的珍妮·拉莫爾在進入紐卡斯爾大學的第一天就去世了,死因是酒精和氯胺酮的致命組合。)
新聞:
UK universities are being urged to ditch a zero-tolerance approach to drug use and focus instead on public health and harm reduction, with drug testing and non-judgmental support for students seeking help.
英國大學被敦促放棄對吸毒的零容忍態(tài)度,轉而關注公共衛(wèi)生和減少危害,為尋求幫助的學生提供毒品測試和非評判性支持。
The warning came as new research found students are less likely to use drugs than those of the same age group in the general population. Of the minority that do, more than two out of five would like to reduce their use.
這一警告是伴隨一項新的研究發(fā)現(xiàn),與一般人群中同年齡段的人相比,學生吸毒的可能性更小而發(fā)出的。在少數(shù)吸毒的學生中,超過五分之二的人希望減少攝入。
Experts remain concerned that a zero-tolerance approach still deployed on some campuses, including fines, suspensions and expulsions, does little to reduce drug use and could deter students from coming forward for help.
專家們?nèi)匀粨模恍┬@仍然采取零容忍的方式,包括罰款、停學和開除,這對減少吸毒幾乎沒有作用,而且可能會阻止學生主動尋求幫助。
Almost one in five (18%) out of 4,000 students who took part in a poll for Universities UK (UUK) – the organization that represents 142 higher education providers – told researchers they had used drugs in the past, while one in eight (12%) had used drugs in the past year.
“英國大學”是一個代表142所高等教育機構的組織,在4000名參加調(diào)查的學生中,近五分之一(18%)的人告訴研究人員,他們過去曾使用過毒品,而八分之一(12%)的人在過去一年中使用過毒品。
Of those who had ever taken drugs, the most commonly used in the past year were cannabis (53%), cocaine (8%), prescxtion drugs (7%), ketamine (6%) and ecstasy (4%).
在曾經(jīng)吸毒的人中,去年最常用的是大麻(53%)、可卡因(8%)、處方藥(7%)、氯胺酮(6%)和搖頭丸(4%)。
Among non-students, almost 18% of 16- to 24-year-olds in England and Wales reported drug use in the year up to March 2023, according to the Office for National Statistics, while in Scotland, 23.5% of the same age group had used drugs in the year prior to being surveyed.
英國國家統(tǒng)計局的數(shù)據(jù)顯示,在非學生群體中,在截至2023年3月的一年中,英格蘭和威爾士16歲至24歲的年輕人中有近18%的人報告使用過毒品。而在蘇格蘭,23.5%的同年齡段人群在接受調(diào)查前一年使用過毒品。
According to UUK, only one in five students who have used drugs in the past 12 months have asked for support from their institution. Of those students who did seek support, nearly half (46%) said their university’s drug policy was a barrier, while more than a third (37%) feared the consequences of coming forward.
根據(jù)英國聯(lián)合大學的數(shù)據(jù),在過去的12個月里,只有五分之一的吸毒學生向?qū)W校尋求過支持。在那些尋求幫助的學生中,近一半的人說他們學校的毒品政策是一個障礙,而超過三分之一的人擔心站出來承認的后果。
Jeni Larmour, 18, of Newtownhamilton in Northern Ireland, died in October 2020 on her first day at Newcastle University after consuming a lethal combination of alcohol and ketamine given to her “by another”, according to a coroner.
據(jù)一名驗尸官稱,來自北愛爾蘭紐頓漢密爾頓的18歲女孩珍妮·拉莫爾于2020年10月在紐卡斯爾大學的第一天死亡,死因是攝入了“另一個人”給她的致命酒精和氯胺酮。
Her mother, Sandra Larmour, welcomed the report and said her own views on drug policy had changed. Where once she might have backed zero tolerance, she now favours educating and supporting students, though she said universities should never condone drug use.
她的母親桑德拉·拉莫爾對這份報告表示歡迎,并表示她自己對毒品政策的看法已經(jīng)改變。她曾經(jīng)可能支持零容忍,但現(xiàn)在她支持教育和支持學生,盡管她說大學永遠不應該容忍吸毒。
“If you tell a bunch of teenagers ‘don’t do something’, you’re on a hiding to nothing. Anybody that’s got children knows that – they’re going to go out and do it,” Larmour said.
拉莫爾說:“如果你告訴一群青少年'不要做某事',你就會一無所獲。任何有孩子的人都知道這一點——他們會出去做這件事的。
“But if you’re doing something in an open and informed manner, that can only help. If you’ve got people there with insight, knowledge and professional experience that can give them guidance on it, and they feel they can come forward, that’s a very positive step.”
“但如果你以公開和知情的方式做某事,那只會有所幫助。如果你在那里找到了有洞察力、知識和專業(yè)經(jīng)驗的人,可以給他們提供指導,他們覺得自己可以挺身站出來,這是非常積極的一步?!?br />
The SafeCourse charity, which was set up to promote harm reduction policies on UK campuses, welcomed UUK’s new frxwork for action. Its founder, Hilton Mervis, whose son Daniel died of an accidental overdose, said a zero-tolerance approach may have discouraged him from seeking help because of fear of expulsion.
為在英國校園推廣減少傷害政策而設立的安全課程慈善機構對英國新的行動框架表示歡迎。它的創(chuàng)始人希爾頓·默維斯的兒子丹尼爾因意外服藥過量而死亡。他說,零容忍的態(tài)度可能使他因為害怕被驅(qū)逐而不愿尋求幫助。
“Drugs left a hole in my family’s life because Daniel was failed by zero-tolerance policies,” he said, adding that the college now has a “clear harm reduction policy which puts the safety and wellbeing of their students first.
他說:“毒品在我的家庭生活中留下了一個空洞,因為丹尼爾沒有遵守零容忍政策?!彼a充說,學院現(xiàn)在有一個“明確的減少傷害政策,把學生的安全和福祉放在第一位?!?br />
“Yet many universities continue to declare zero tolerance on drugs. In practice, this means zero action. This puts students at risk. The time has come for universities to adopt active, student-led harm reduction approaches.”
“然而,許多大學繼續(xù)宣稱對毒品零容忍。在實踐中,這意味著零行動。這讓學生處于危險之中?,F(xiàn)在是大學采取積極的、以學生為主導的減少傷害方法的時候了。”
The UUK report, Enabling student health and success: tackling supply and demand for drugs and improving harm reduction, published on Tuesday, also calls on universities to promote and inform students of drug checking services. “Students often do not know the contents and strength of illicit drugs at the point of purchase,” it says.
本周二公布的這份名為《促進學生健康和成功:解決毒品供求問題,減少危害》的報告還呼吁大學推廣并告知學生毒品檢查服務。報告稱:“學生在購買時往往不知道違禁藥物的成分和強度。
“The consequences of this can be fatal. Drug checking provides an independent service which encourages students to have any substances of concern tested by chemists, and the results discussed during a consultation with a health professional.”
“這樣的后果可能是致命的。藥物檢查提供了一項獨立的服務,鼓勵學生讓化學家檢測任何令人擔憂的物質(zhì),并在咨詢健康專業(yè)人員時討論結果?!?br />
It also suggests a sliding scale of warnings of increasing severity for repeat incidents over an agreed timefrx to ensure a university is not perceived as permissive about the use of drugs.
該報告還建議,在商定的時間框架內(nèi),對重復發(fā)生的事件進行逐步加重的警告,以確保一所大學不會被視為縱容使用毒品。
Larmour urged parents whose children are preparing to go off to university in the autumn to talk to their child. “Make sure that you’re open and honest with them.” To youngsters about to leave home, she said: “Be aware of your surroundings. Be aware of who your friends are. Think before you do anything.
拉莫爾敦促那些準備在秋天上大學的孩子的父母和他們的孩子談談。“確保你對他們是開放和誠實的。”對于即將離家的年輕人,她說:“注意你周圍的環(huán)境。知道誰是你的朋友。三思而后行。
“I miss Jeni every day of my life. I think about her all the time. Everything I do, I do it for one reason. That’s to keep her name alive, to keep her name on people’s lips, to keep her memory alive.”
“我每天都在想念珍妮。我一直在想她。我做的每件事,都只有一個原因。這是為了讓她的名字流傳下去,讓她的名字留在人們的嘴邊,讓她的記憶永存?!?br />
評論翻譯
很贊 ( 8 )
收藏
I'd like to congratulate drugs for winning the war on drugs
我要祝賀毒品贏得了毒品戰(zhàn)爭
SomeShiitakePosterNottinghamshire
It is inevitable. Drugs have existed as long as the human race, what arrogance to think that you will finally be the generation that eliminates them.
這是不可避免的。毒品自人類誕生以來就存在了,你以為自己終將成為消滅毒品的一代是多么傲慢啊。
WolfCola4
Absolutely - and what arrogance to think that everyone agrees with you that drugs should be eliminated. If everyone thought that, they already would be eliminated. People don't all enjoy the same things, and that's fine.
絕對是這樣——認為每個人都贊同你應該消除毒品,這是多么傲慢啊。如果每個人都這么想,他們早就被淘汰了。人們并不都喜歡同樣的東西,這很好。
TheGamblingAddict
There is a theory that drugs played a part in human evolution. Psilocybin mushrooms (magic mushrooms), were believed to have been used by Homo erectus which kickstarted the cognitive revolution which led to Homo sapiens, the exact mushroom in question was believed to be Psilocybe cubensis. This theory was based on studies by a gent named Roland L. Fischer. This is just one theory of many, the stoned ape theory I believe it got called.
Also a quick one, Professor David Nutt, was forced to resign from his job (2009 I believe?) after the Government (UK) had asked him to investigate the damaging effects of LSD, ecstasy and cannabis. Well they didn't like the results, turns out all three of those drugs, are less harmful than legal ones. Alcohol and tobacco ranked higher on the scale. They didn't like that one bit, forced a man to resign for doing the job they asked him too, all because they didn't like the results.
有一種理論認為毒品在人類進化中起到了一定的作用。裸蓋菇(神奇蘑菇)被認為是直立人攝入過的,他們由此開啟了認知革命,導致了智人的出現(xiàn),而這種被質(zhì)疑的蘑菇被認為是裸蓋菇。這個理論是基于一個名叫羅蘭·l·費舍爾的人的研究。這只是眾多理論中的一種,我相信它被稱為“醉猴理論”。
還有一個快速的例子,大衛(wèi)·納特教授,在政府(英國)要求他調(diào)查麥角酸二乙基酰胺、搖頭丸和大麻的破壞性影響后,被迫辭職(我想是2009年吧?)他們不喜歡這個調(diào)查結果——這三種藥物比合法藥物的危害更小。酒精和煙草排名更高。他們一點也不喜歡這樣,強迫一個人辭職,因為他做了他們要求他做的工作,都是因為他們不喜歡結果。
BartlebyFunx
Legalise the fucking lot and control it. Allow it to become dosed and kept in controlled situations. This would deal a massive blow to UK and global crime gangs. It would make the economy extremely strong and would see deaths plummet.
把毒品合法化,控制它。允許它成為劑量藥物,并保持在可控的情況下。這將對英國和全球犯罪團伙造成巨大打擊。它將使經(jīng)濟極其強勁,并將看到死亡人數(shù)急劇下降。
Wardendexe
Yes and the government can tax drug sales too, win win.
是的,政府也可以對藥品銷售征稅,雙贏。
soulsteela
Look at the American towns that have pulled back from the brink by doing this with weed, suddenly got huge influx of cash, local businesses growing, others selling it, all employing people and paying tax, leading to a general improvement in living and education conditions for an awful lot of people. Better than jail just because they’d rather get wasted on something other than booze. The illegal cannabis industry in the U.K. turns over more than £5 billion that could be invested in your local town instead of disappearing offshore.
看看美國的一些城鎮(zhèn),他們通過對大麻的處理實現(xiàn)了力挽狂瀾,突然有了大量的現(xiàn)金流入,當?shù)氐钠髽I(yè)在發(fā)展,其他人在出售大麻,所有人都雇傭了人,繳納了稅,導致很多人的生活和教育條件得到了普遍改善??偙纫驗樗麄儗幵赴彦X浪費在酒以外的東西上而坐牢要好。英國的非法大麻產(chǎn)業(yè)帶來了超過50億英鎊的收入,這些錢本可以投資到你當?shù)氐某擎?zhèn),而不是消失在海外。
___a1b1
Although things went wrong in Oregon when they decriminalised hard drugs for personal consumption.
The trouble is that consumption goes up when something is more easily available/marketed/reliable then that means you end up with rises in things like addiction, and addiction then creates a black economy of it's own (theft, homelessness, prostitution etc) as a percentage of users always fall into that hole, so bring in more users then that results in more people falling into the pit. The notion of spending taxes on treatment is flawed as addicts have to go through a lot before it really actually works for them if it ever does, so that means that they live in that underbelly of society with crime etc, so that might well increase due to more people joining the addict sub-set.
然而在俄勒岡州,當他們將個人消費的烈性毒品合法化時,事情出了問題。
問題在于,當某些東西更容易獲得/銷售/可靠時,消費就會上升,這意味著成癮等事情會上升,而成癮會創(chuàng)造出自己的黑色經(jīng)濟(盜竊、無家可歸、賣淫等等),因為一定比例的吸食者總是落入這個陷阱,所以吸引更多的吸食者,就會導致更多的人陷入這個陷阱。將稅收用于治療的想法是有缺陷的,因為成癮者必須經(jīng)歷很多戒毒措施才能真正對他們起作用(如果戒毒真的起作用的話),這意味著他們生活在犯罪等社會的底層等等,所以由于越來越多的人淪為了成癮亞群體,這可能會繼續(xù)加劇問題。
reckless-rogboy
Things went wrong in Oregon and similary in Washington because they stopped dealing with criminal activity by addicts, at all.
The first steps in a sensible legalization strategy are to apply the lessons learned from the booze trade. Licensed premises, controlled hours and restrictions on sales to intoxicated individuals all act as a behavioral nudge to prevent excessive consumption for the majority. Prosecuting crimes committed by users brings problem users into view.
Obviously different substances cause problems in different ways and over different timescales. Identifying appropriate policies and actions to apply to individuals in the ground between starting excess use and full blown medical detox is where the hard part is.
俄勒岡州和華盛頓州的情況都很糟糕,因為他們根本不處理癮君子的犯罪活動。
明智的合法化策略的第一步是從酒交易中吸取教訓。有執(zhí)照的營業(yè)場所、有時間限制、限制向醉酒的人銷售,這些都是防止大多數(shù)人過度消費的行為推動舉措。對飲酒者犯罪的起訴使問題飲酒者得以正視。
顯然,不同的物質(zhì)會以不同的方式、在不同的時間尺度上引發(fā)問題。對適用于在開始過量使用和全面的醫(yī)療戒毒之間的個人確定適當?shù)恼吆托袆樱攀抢щy的部分。
CloneOfKarl
Allow it to become dosed and kept in controlled situations.
It would make the economy extremely strong and would see deaths plummet.
I don't like the idea of making the economy strong bY LEEching off the vulnerable. That money would be coming from their pockets. Such a system should not be incentivised by profits.
How do you define 'controlled situation'? I'm assuming you mean that people can walk in off the street, pay for drugs, and use them there and then, whilst being monitored for sometime afterwards? What are the limits on this? Would someone be able to walk in again an hour later? How would personal tolerance be taken into consideration? Has any other country implemented this?
Don't get me wrong though, I think that any personal possession should be legal, and that people should have access to cheap drug testing services (if practically possible). We should not be criminalising what is effectively a medical condition.
“允許它成為劑量藥物,并保持在可控的情況下。
它將使經(jīng)濟極其強勁,并將看到死亡人數(shù)急劇下降?!?br /> 我不喜歡靠壓榨弱勢群體來增強經(jīng)濟的想法。這筆錢將來自他們的口袋。這種制度不應受到利潤的激勵。
你如何定義“可控的情況”?我猜你的意思是人們可以在街上隨便走進去,付錢買毒品,然后當場吸食,之后還要接受一段時間的監(jiān)控?它的限制是什么?有人能在一小時后再進來嗎?如何考慮個人的容忍度?有其他國家實施過嗎?
不要誤解我的意思,我認為任何個人持有毒品都應該是合法的,人們應該有機會獲得廉價的毒品測試服務(如果可能的話)。我們不應該將實際上是一種疾病的行為定為犯罪。
spackysteve
Do universities actually care if students use drugs?
大學是否真的關心學生是否吸毒?
Blue_winged_yoshi
Universities don’t get massively involved in people’s lives outside. What a harm reduction pivot would enable would be a student to go to welfare and say “this is really embarrassing, but my friends and I got into coke and it’s started to impact my studies and I don’t want it to get worse”, and student welfare could then signpost to appropriate support services without any risk of disciplinary action. Zero tolerance prevents this conversation from taking place and that’s a bad thing.
大學不會過多地參與到人們的課外生活中。一個減少傷害的重點是能讓一個學生去福利機構坦白:“這真的很尷尬,但我和我的朋友都吸了可卡因,這開始影響我的學習,我不想讓情況變得更糟”,然后學生福利機構就可以向他們提供適當?shù)闹С址?,而不會有任何紀律處分的風險。(當前的)零容忍做法阻止了這種對話的發(fā)生,這是一件壞事。
TrustTheScience0
pharmaceutical drugs kill more, but you never hear a peep.
藥物致死的人更多,但你從來沒有聽到一個(反對藥品的)聲音。
Ok-Comparison6923
Decriminalise drugs and you remove the contact with criminals for users. The gateway has never been the drug itself, it’s the connections and the network.
Also you can control the ingredients and make them safer. You can make them cheaper and tax them.
For people opposed to drugs, do you ever drink? Smoke? If you do, what makes YOUR drug OK but not other people’s?
將毒品合法化,你就消除了吸毒者與罪犯的接觸。途徑從來不是毒品本身,而是連接和網(wǎng)絡。
你也可以控制毒品成分,使它們更安全。你可以讓它們更便宜,并對它們征稅。
對于那些反對毒品的人,你喝酒嗎?抽煙嗎?如果你是,是什么讓你的“毒品”可以,而別人的就不行呢?
Firstpoet
Legalise drugs. OK. I don't want to pay for your related health treatments you need because of your choices, though. Compulsory health insurance, or you're on your own. Same with alcohol. Wasting resources in Casualty while a sick child is waiting?
毒品合法化。好的。但我不想因為你的選擇而為你支付相關的健康治療費用。強制醫(yī)療保險,否則你就得靠自己了。酒精也是一樣。當一個生病的孩子在等待時,(因為救治吸毒者而)在急診室浪費資源?
Ok-Buyer2600
Damn maybe if you just not take drugs it's never a problem. Pretty easy to not accidentally snort or inject expensive and illegal substances
該死的,也許只要你不吸毒就不會有問題。避免不小心吸食或注射昂貴的非法毒物是很容易的