KB有可能是假扮印度人的中國賬號嗎？可能性有多大？沒有人見過他本人，而且在領(lǐng)英上也找不到任何與這個名字和相關(guān)資質(zhì)匹配的個人資料

Kanthaswamy Balasubramaniam
What is the gain for a Chinese handle to set up an Indian account on Quora and post about how great China is and about Goundamani Senthil comedies???
What is the gain?
Quora doesn't deal in top secret information
Quora doesn't deal in State Secrets
Why would the Chinese set up a Handle and talk of Ambani, Adani or Modi?
Makes no logical sense

一個中國用戶在Quora上創(chuàng)建一個印度賬號，然后發(fā)布關(guān)于中國有多么偉大和Goundamani Senthil喜劇的內(nèi)容，有什么好處呢？
有什么好處呢？
Quora并不涉及機密信息
Quora不處理國家機密
為什么中國人要創(chuàng)建一個賬號來談?wù)揂mbani、Adani或Modi呢？
這在邏輯上講不通。

Gopalkrishna Vishwanath
No.
He is not a Chinese handle.
He is very much an Indian who fanatically believes in Com...ism and sincerely admires China and all things Chinese.
How do I know?
Just my gut feeling from experience of life.
No Chinese national can write like him on Indian topics.
Maybe he gets support and information from China, but the final posting is definitely his.
His style of writing is unique. Indianness oozes from his writings. No Chinese man can write like him in English.
He has his personal reasons to stay in the background and not show his face.
We must respect his choice.

不。
他不是一個中國賬號。
他是一個狂熱地信仰共產(chǎn)主義并真誠地崇拜中國和一切中國事物的印度人。
我怎么知道的？
只是我生活經(jīng)驗中的直覺。
沒有中國人能像他那樣寫印度話題。
也許他從中國獲得支持和信息，但最終的發(fā)布絕對是他的。
他的寫作風(fēng)格是獨一無二的。印度風(fēng)格從他的文字中流露出來。沒有中國人能像他那樣用英語寫作。
他有自己的理由保持低調(diào)，不露面。
我們必須尊重他的選擇。

I have high personal regard for him even though I totally disagree with his views on BJP and Modi.
He revels in swimming upstream. He loves going against popular opinion and is not afraid to express unpopular views. I am reminded of an old Tamil film title “edhir neechchal”. (swimming against the current).. For every detractor he has, he also has admirers and supporters.
I am happy to note that he is perhaps Quora’s most viewed writer today. I wish him all the best and sincerely hope that someday he will agree to meet me or allow me to meet him.

盡管我完全不同意他對BJP和Modi的看法，但我對他個人非常尊敬。
他喜歡逆流而上。他喜歡與大眾意見相反，并且不怕表達不受歡迎的觀點。這讓我想起了一部舊的泰米爾電影的標(biāo)題“edhir neechchal”（逆流而上）。他有反對者，也有崇拜者和支持者。
我很高興地注意到，他可能是今天Quora上最受關(guān)注的作家。我祝他一切順利，并真誠希望有一天他會同意與我見面或允許我見他。

Subramaniam Duraisamy
No he is not a Chinese handle. A Chinese bot cannot write such accurate answers about Indian 2 Kamal Haasan movie or about the Butter Masala dosa of Rameshwaram Cafe.
He is as Indian as you, me and Nagarajan Srinivas Sir (Sorry for pulling your leg once again ).
However KB gives an appearance of being a bot because he writes a minimum of 30 answers a day in the same topic for multiple days.

不，他不是一個中國賬號。一個中國機器人不可能寫出如此準(zhǔn)確的關(guān)于印度2 Kamal Haasan電影或Rameshwaram咖啡館的Butter Masala dosa的答案。
他和你、我以及Nagarajan Srinivas先生一樣是印度人（再次開你玩笑，抱歉）。
然而，KB給人的感覺像是一個機器人，因為他每天至少在同一個話題上寫30個答案，并且連續(xù)多天如此。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處

Go through his profile and you can see as of 15/7/2024 he has written a lot of answers on Mukesh Ambani’s wedding. Ironically I have muted all the stories from Instagram and Facebook, and I get more news about that event from Sir Ji’s handle than any other social media site .
Also Sir Ji specialises in shock and awe theories and capitalised on the noise quotient of Quora to get views.
One such “shock and awe” idea in the recent times is how nationalization of Ambani's assets would improve poverty and inequality in India.

查看他的個人資料，你可以看到截至2024年7月15日，他已經(jīng)寫了很多關(guān)于Mukesh Ambani婚禮的答案。諷刺的是，我已經(jīng)屏蔽了Instagram和Facebook上的所有相關(guān)故事，但我從Sir Ji的賬號上獲得的關(guān)于那個事件的消息比任何其他社交媒體網(wǎng)站都多。
此外，Sir Ji專注于震撼理論，并利用Quora的噪音指數(shù)來獲得瀏覽量。
最近的一個“震撼”想法是，國有化Ambani的資產(chǎn)如何改善印度的貧困和不平等。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處

Ofcourse empirical evidence and historical evidence point to the opposite, but then the average Indian on Quora cares more about a Rajnikanth movie where a 75 year old thalaivar bashing 100 people at once over a boring documentary. So there is that.

當(dāng)然，實證證據(jù)和歷史證據(jù)表明相反的情況，但Quora上的普通印度人更關(guān)心的是一部Rajnikanth電影，在這部電影中，一位75歲的thalaivar同時打敗了100個人，而不是一部無聊的紀(jì)錄片。所以就是這樣。

Valerie Van Kerckhove
You overestimate the ability of Chinese people if you think they can come up with a name such as Kanthaswamy Balasubramaniam. Chinese names are usually 2 or 3 syllables, max 4, so it's Really hard for Chinese to remember long names.

如果你認(rèn)為中國人能想出像Kanthaswamy Balasubramaniam這樣的名字，你就高估了他們的能力。中國名字通常是2或3個音節(jié)，最多4個，所以對中國人來說記住長名字真的很難。

In fact, there's a comedy song in Chinese, Dalabengba. The joke is that all the characters have such impossibly long names, that they all have to repeat it several times each time. These “impossibly” long, “tongue twister” names are:
Dalabengba Bandebeidi Buduobiluweng
Miyamola Sunadanni xielihong
Kuntukutakatikaote Suwaxilasong
If Kanthaswamy Balasubramaniam doesn't immediately stand out as a made up funny name, it's unlikely a Chinese is able to come up with it.
(You can claim some Chinese person put in some effort. A Chinese person who hates India would not put in the effort)

事實上，有一首中文喜劇歌曲叫《達拉崩吧》。笑點在于所有角色的名字都長到不可思議，每次說話都要重復(fù)好幾遍。這些“不可思議”的長名字、繞口令般的名字是：
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處

Dalabengba Bandebeidi Buduobiluweng
Miyamola Sunadanni xielihong
Kuntukutakatikaote Suwaxilasong

要是中國人想出 Kanthaswamy Balasubramaniam 這么個名字，那可真是太有才了。
（你可以說某個中國人付出了努力。一個討厭印度的中國人不會付出這種努力）

India-China Relations
What is the likelihood of Kanthaswamy Balasubramaniam being a Chinese handle, pretending to be an Indian person? No one has seen him, there is no lixedIn footprint with the handle with the credentials.

Kanthaswamy Balasubramaniam是一個中國賬號，假裝成印度人的可能性有多大？沒有人見過他，他的賬號沒有任何lixedIn的足跡和憑證。

That Kanthaswamy Balasubramaniam admires China, its efficiency, its emphasis on meritocracy, its civil engineering prowess, its emphasis on accountability and in general all things Chinese, does not make him a Chinese handle masquerading with an Indian name. He has published so many incidents connected with his growing up, his service years, his legal acumen with Indian legal system to exclude any such possibility. I follow him and he too follows me. Not having a lixedIn footprint should not raise doubts. I for one have not tried to be on lixedIn. Longtime back I used to use Facebook, but I don't do it anymore, just read it occasionally. The exhorting of joining friends group, and being swamped with details of activities of people I knew in my life is good but exhorting me to like it or wish that is a big put off. So in my opinion Kanthaswamy Balasubramaniam Sir, is very much Indian, even though his admiration for China is disconcerting after the way China's aggression against India still continues and it does everything to block India from gaining even a little bit of influence or power. And China forgets when it was a pariah among the nations of the world, after the Korean war, it was India under Nehru, that lent it respectability. And it stabbed India in the back.

Kanthaswamy Balasubramaniam欽佩中國，它的效率，它對精英制度的重視，它的土木工程實力，它對問責(zé)制的重視以及一般的所有中國事物，這并不使他成為一個偽裝成印度名字的中國賬號。他已經(jīng)發(fā)表了很多與他成長經(jīng)歷、服役年限、他對印度法律體系的法律才能有關(guān)的事件，排除了這種可能性。我關(guān)注他，他也關(guān)注我。沒有l(wèi)ixedIn的足跡不應(yīng)該引起懷疑。我自己就沒有嘗試過在lixedIn上。很久以前我曾經(jīng)使用Facebook，但現(xiàn)在不再用了，只是偶爾閱讀。加入朋友群的號召，以及被我認(rèn)識的人們的活動細(xì)節(jié)所淹沒是好的，但讓我點贊或祝福的號召讓我很反感。因此在我看來，Kanthaswamy Balasubramaniam先生，是非常純正的印度人，盡管他對中國的欽佩令人不安，畢竟中國對印度的侵略仍在繼續(xù)，并且它竭盡全力阻止印度獲得哪怕一點點的影響力或權(quán)力。中國忘記了，當(dāng)它在朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭后成為世界上被排斥的國家時，是尼赫魯領(lǐng)導(dǎo)下的印度賦予了它尊嚴(yán)。而它卻在背后捅了印度一刀。

Dongfang Gao
Impossible. If he is Chinese, he cannot write an answer that fits the Indian mindset.
Indians cannot write an answer that fits the Chinese mindset either.
Because the culture, history, and experience are completely different, it is easy to make mistakes.
I know that India has a caste system and I know about Hinduism, but I don't know anything about anyone except Shiva.

不可能。如果他是中國人，他不可能寫出符合印度思維方式的答案。
印度人也無法寫出符合中國思維方式的答案。
因為文化、歷史和經(jīng)歷完全不同，很容易出錯。
我知道印度有種姓制度，我知道印度教，但除了濕婆，我對其他人一無所知。