“中國航天計(jì)劃遠(yuǎn)比大多數(shù)人意識(shí)到的要先進(jìn)得多 ” 馬斯克提醒NASA，中國在航天項(xiàng)目上依然被低估

@USAKaput
Neil Armshit never landed on the moon....he landed on the filming studios of hollywood

尼爾·阿姆斯特朗從未登陸月球……他是登陸了好萊塢的拍攝棚。

@rnwaterpurification1030
Absolutely right. It is Hollywood movie.

完全正確。這是好萊塢電影。

@rnwaterpurification1030
Astronauts never landed on the moon. It's hoax

宇航員從未登陸月球。這是騙局。

@Anonymous------
Their hip HOP break dancing gave them away, no one in real life would do that on the moon.

他們的嘻哈霹靂舞暴露了他們，現(xiàn)實(shí)中沒有人會(huì)在月球上做這種事。

@Billck24
If they have why they stop sending to the moon? We are not dumb.

如果他們真的登陸過月球，為什么之后就停止了？我們可不傻。

@say6607
things that make people skeptical of the moon landing is how come they(said to have) discarded those landing data after the trips? that's beyond reason.

讓人懷疑月球登陸的事情是，為什么他們（據(jù)說）在旅行后丟棄了那些登陸數(shù)據(jù)？這完全沒有道理。

@mason2547
Area 51.

51區(qū)。

@erwinchn
China’s private space sector is booming now with strong support from government and venture investors. This is inspired by SpaceX’s huge success in both technology and economy.

中國的私人航天領(lǐng)域現(xiàn)在正在蓬勃發(fā)展，得到了政府和風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資者的強(qiáng)力支持。這受到SpaceX在技術(shù)和經(jīng)濟(jì)方面巨大成功的啟發(fā)。

@erwinchn
Plus on the engineering side Chinese are no lack of confidence on project execution and commitment. The only obstacle is reusable rocket, multiple private companies are testing it. Once cleared, we will expect more launches than SpaceX.

此外，在工程方面，中國人對項(xiàng)目執(zhí)行和承諾充滿信心。唯一的障礙是可重復(fù)使用的火箭，多個(gè)私人公司正在測試。一旦突破，我們預(yù)計(jì)發(fā)射次數(shù)將超過SpaceX。

@1Diveal0t\\\\_wallyWombat
CHINA will far exceed the USA's achievements with its Space Stations, Moon Base and Satellites. This will enable China to take control of Satellite Surveillance activities, including sextive destruction to give them the necessary defence advantages needed for War. Positioning of spaced Space Stations, Satellites, Missilite  Bases and Automonous Manufacturing and Research Bases in Orbit and Moon Based. Placing their major infrastructure a 1,000 kilometers further out will give them total domination to handle any conflicts with impunity. Remember China thinks in Decads and Centuries, not just short term Electoral periods periods.

中國將在空間站、月球基地和衛(wèi)星方面遠(yuǎn)超美國。這將使中國能夠控制衛(wèi)星監(jiān)視活動(dòng)，包括選擇性摧毀，從而獲得必要的防御優(yōu)勢以應(yīng)對戰(zhàn)爭。通過在軌道和月球上部署空間站、衛(wèi)星、導(dǎo)彈基地及自動(dòng)化制造與研究基地，將其主要基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施再推向1000公里遠(yuǎn)的地方，將使其完全主導(dǎo)，以便在沖突中無所畏懼。記住，中國是以幾十年和幾個(gè)世紀(jì)為單位思考的，而不僅僅是短期的選舉周期。

@nanotech\\\\_republika
No need to watch. Here is the summary from ChatGPT: China’s space program is rapidly gaining power, with a lunar base planned by 2036, its own space station built in just over a year (vs. over 10 years for the ISS), and increasing use of reusable rockets—challenging U.S. leadership as NASA still leads in funding, private innovation (e.g. SpaceX), and satellite numbers. While the U.S. maintains the edge for now, China’s fast, methodical progress threatens long-term dominance.

不需要觀看。這是ChatGPT的總結(jié)：中國的航天計(jì)劃正在迅速崛起，計(jì)劃在2036年前建立月球基地，自己的空間站在短短一年多的時(shí)間里完成建設(shè)（而國際空間站則需要超過10年），并越來越多地使用可重復(fù)使用的火箭——這對美國的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)地位構(gòu)成了挑戰(zhàn)，盡管美國仍在資金、私人創(chuàng)新（如SpaceX）和衛(wèi)星數(shù)量方面領(lǐng)先，但中國的快速而有條不紊的進(jìn)展威脅著美國的長期主導(dǎo)地位。

@jgwizo
This AI opinion shows the apps are compromised and still arguing like a capitalist in technology which is separate from funding method and denial that having fewer flights is a significant success criteria.

這個(gè)AI的觀點(diǎn)表明，應(yīng)用程序已經(jīng)被破壞，仍然像資本主義者一樣爭論技術(shù)問題，忽略了資金方式，并否認(rèn)飛行次數(shù)少是一個(gè)重要的成功標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。

@petersaw3379
China is gaining in every field.. You name it and they are there EXCEPT in SOCCER.. They couldn't produce a  an eleven Member team that could even qualify for FIFA WORLD CUP

中國在各個(gè)領(lǐng)域都在取得進(jìn)展……你說的任何領(lǐng)域，他們都在，除了足球……他們甚至無法組建一支能參加世界杯的11人球隊(duì)。

@vegamoonlight
ChatGPT, the Zionist app.

ChatGPT，猶太復(fù)國主義應(yīng)用。

@nanotech\\\\_republika
@petersaw3379 Right, it's hard to steal or copy that.

對，難以偷竊或復(fù)制。

@tuber6382
@petersaw3379China is also behind in NBA and OnlyFans content.  USI is #1

中國在NBA和OnlyFans內(nèi)容方面也落后。美國是第一。

@madsam0320
@petersaw3379 their women footballers are very good, getting to finals more often than not. Football is not popular in China, table tennis they are champs.

他們的女子足球運(yùn)動(dòng)員非常出色，經(jīng)常進(jìn)入決賽。足球在中國不受歡迎，但他們在乒乓球上是冠軍。

@touraroundtheworld7190
I start to wonder. Is it really true the US did make it ever to space or the moon. They need the help from amateurs to go to space or the moon. Or was it all a Walt Disney movie

我開始懷疑。美國真的曾經(jīng)登上過太空或月球嗎？他們需要業(yè)余愛好者的幫助才能進(jìn)入太空或登月，還是這一切只是一部沃爾特·迪士尼的電影？

@Anonymous------
If humans can pass through the Van Allen Belts, don't you think they are doing that today? Obviously no human has ever passed through the Van Allen Belts.

如果人類能夠穿越范·艾倫輻射帶，你不認(rèn)為他們現(xiàn)在應(yīng)該在做這件事嗎？顯然，沒有人類曾經(jīng)穿越過范·艾倫輻射帶。

@agusedyanto3324
@Anonymous------ Well for that the Chinese will prove it before 2030, just wait and see

為此，中國人將在2030年之前證明這一點(diǎn)，等著瞧吧。

@joelchoy312
ISS is like a spagetti kid's room while Tian Goon (Heaven Palace in Chinese) is the real international space station. Bill Nelson can demand whatever budget from congress he wants. The reality is t he US doesn't have \\\\$ period while national debt is 36 trillions.

國際空間站就像一個(gè)雜亂的孩子房間，而天宮（中文意思是“天上的宮殿”）才是真正的國際空間站。比爾·尼爾森可以從國會(huì)要求任何預(yù)算。但現(xiàn)實(shí)是美國根本沒有錢，而國家債務(wù)已經(jīng)達(dá)到36萬億。

@colonbina1
Private companies can help?

私人公司能提供幫助嗎？

@MrSummerblade
@colonbina1 How private? Most of their money comes from the federal government. They’re not profitable, just sucking out tax dollars to prop up stock value.

多私人呢？他們的大部分資金來自聯(lián)邦政府。他們沒有盈利，只是吸取稅款來支撐股票價(jià)值。

@agusedyanto3324
I think it's not just a funding issue, but technical issues and technological capabilities are also problematic.

我認(rèn)為這不僅是資金問題，技術(shù)問題和技術(shù)能力也存在問題。

@miker3298
Funding is going to the zionists and Nazis ( Ukraine)

資金流向了猶太復(fù)國主義者和納粹分子（烏克蘭）。

@lenhsaudis4la
Well the US could if they stop funneling all their money to starting wars, trying to overthrow other governments and supporting racist countries like Israel to commit murders and war crimes

如果美國停止把所有錢花在發(fā)動(dòng)戰(zhàn)爭、推翻其他政府和支持像以色列這樣的種族主義國家犯下謀殺和戰(zhàn)爭罪行上，他們本來是能做到的。

@rtc3000
Tian Gong, not Goon.

天宮，而不是Goon。

@fredericlaimink658
Les chinois seront pour de vrai les premiers humains à mettre le pied sur la lune.

中國人將是真正第一個(gè)登上月球的人。

@colonbina1
What about Apolo?

阿波羅怎么辦？

@strongchallenger2269
@colonbina1what about it? If the US has gone to the moon, tell us why they can't repeat the same technology as they have done it before? I mean obviously they should be able to improve on the old technology and get to the moon without issue. For the Chinese, it would be far more difficult because they don't have the data but they have the technology to boot.

那怎么樣呢？如果美國真的去過月球，告訴我們?yōu)槭裁此麄儾荒苤貜?fù)以前的技術(shù)？顯然，他們應(yīng)該能夠改進(jìn)舊技術(shù)，順利到達(dá)月球。對于中國來說，難度會(huì)大得多，因?yàn)樗麄儧]有數(shù)據(jù)，但他們有技術(shù)基礎(chǔ)。

@icare7151
NASA means: Nothing Accomplished Space Agency

NASA意味著：無所作為的太空局。

@YoYo-k2g1z
Without NASA u couldn't comment

沒有NASA，你無法評(píng)論。

@g.m.8360
Who is competing the only one competing is the United States. Just how much of the US programs are done by Chinese engineers and researchers? It’s literally is like America needs China to compete with China?

誰在競爭？唯一在競爭的是美國。美國的項(xiàng)目有多少是由中國工程師和研究人員完成的？這簡直就像是美國需要中國與中國競爭？

@fredericlaimink658
Des américains sur la lune? Quelle plaisanterie.

美國人在月球上？真是個(gè)笑話。

@2face789
Does NASA actually build anything or do they just license others to build for them.

NASA真的建造過任何東西，還是他們只是授權(quán)別人為他們建造？

@jimeditorial
NASA has a limited design and build capability for spacecraft, but they have always used commercial Aerospace contractors to build the hardware. The giant Saturn V used stages which were built by the large aircraft companies. The first stage was a NASA effort, but was assembled with Aerospace contractors, and of course all the engines were outsourced. This has been one of the long-term goals of nasa, to get out of the hardware and space launch business and focus on the research goals instead.

NASA有有限的航天器設(shè)計(jì)和建造能力，但他們一直使用商業(yè)航天承包商來建造硬件。
巨大的Saturn V火箭使用的各部分都由大型航空公司建造。
第一階段是NASA的工作，但由航空航天承包商組裝，當(dāng)然，所有的發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)都是外包的。這一直是NASA的長期目標(biāo)之一，退出硬件和太空發(fā)射業(yè)務(wù)，專注于研究目標(biāo)。

@notchit3542
The crazy part is that they only shifted to tech like 25 years ago, instead of just cheap plastic toys, T-shirts, & kitchenware.

瘋狂的部分是，他們大約25年前才轉(zhuǎn)向科技，而不是僅僅生產(chǎn)便宜的塑料玩具、T恤和廚房用品。

@agusedyanto3324
What would be even crazier is if the "technology from 25 years ago" was just a product of Hollywood, not in real practice

更瘋狂的是，如果那“25年前的技術(shù)”只是一部好萊塢的產(chǎn)品，而不是真實(shí)的實(shí)踐。

@lenhsaudis4la
How is it a comparison when the US does it with help from a dozen other countries but China does it by themselves?  China is already in a class of its own there.

美國是與十幾個(gè)其他國家的幫助下完成的，這怎么能和中國單獨(dú)完成的相比？中國已經(jīng)在這方面處于獨(dú)立的地位。

@kristoffereberius2476
True, and China was blocked by the US to join the iss, yet when China started its own they have consistently invited and encouraged international collaboration. The only reason the Russians are part of the iss is their experience with Mir and the US reliance on Russian rockets to get there. The US have consistently relied on the Russians to get their astronauts and modules into space. When the iss is done and the US can consistently get to space themselves the Russians will surely collaborate with China

確實(shí)，中國曾被美國阻止加入國際空間站，但當(dāng)中國開始自己的項(xiàng)目時(shí)，他們始終邀請并鼓勵(lì)國際合作。俄羅斯之所以成為國際空間站的一部分，是因?yàn)樗麄冇蠱ir的經(jīng)驗(yàn)，而美國依賴俄羅斯的火箭將宇航員和模塊送到那里。

美國一直依賴俄羅斯將宇航員和模塊送入太空。當(dāng)國際空間站完成并且美國能穩(wěn)定地自己進(jìn)入太空時(shí)，俄羅斯肯定會(huì)與中國合作。

@rtc3000
This will never happen if NASA didn't exclude China into ISS.

如果NASA不把中國排除在國際空間站之外，這永遠(yuǎn)不會(huì)發(fā)生。

@sharynbaker1266
It’s a shame that American corporations waisting more time jockeying their power struggles than cooperative strategies!

美國公司浪費(fèi)了更多時(shí)間在爭斗權(quán)力上，而不是制定合作戰(zhàn)略，真是可惜！

@petepefley8023
HAPPY JULY 19TH Kevin!   The SLS should be used to place Hub- module in orbit for docking of multiple modules or Starships! We would atleast be starting the next space station!

凱文，7月19日快樂！SLS應(yīng)該用來將Hub模塊送入軌道，以便對接多個(gè)模塊或星艦！至少我們可以開始下一個(gè)空間站了！

@KonglengLee-t6l
India and US should collaborate on moon landing either thru hollywood or bollywood. Indians version should be more convincing like their cartoonish atari rocket lamding

印度和美國應(yīng)該在月球登陸方面進(jìn)行合作，可以通過好萊塢或?qū)毴R塢。印度版本應(yīng)該更具說服力，就像他們那種卡通風(fēng)格的火箭登陸一樣。

@stanleycheung5693
Comparing the soil sample between China and USA retrieved from the moon, then you should remake this video.

比較中國和美國從月球上采集的土壤樣本，然后你應(yīng)該重新制作這個(gè)視頻。

@3dtexan890
Bill Nelson again. This shows how AI are never going to learn from all the mistakes.

比爾·尼爾森又來了。這表明AI永遠(yuǎn)不會(huì)從所有的錯(cuò)誤中學(xué)習(xí)。

@USAKaput
Ai is full of bullshit....All idiots

AI充滿了胡說八道……全是傻瓜。

@barkbay
Your competition lens skews your reporting.

你的競爭視角扭曲了你的報(bào)道。

@argenireyes5954
You sound like the guy from the Channel frxRated that talks about videogames

你聽起來像是Channel frxRated的那位談?wù)撾娮佑螒虻募一铩?br />
@mathiasaireguame2628:
When they talk like this, you know, they are lagging behind

當(dāng)他們這樣說時(shí)，你就知道他們已經(jīng)落后了。

@mikemerlo4156:
Too many political "cooks in the kitchen" when it comes to NASA.

在NASA的問題上，政治干預(yù)太多了。

@Emiliocab47:
Don't worry Starship will make a successful LEO test flight around about flight 200

不用擔(dān)心，星艦將在約200次飛行時(shí)進(jìn)行成功的近地球軌道（LEO）測試飛行。

@mason2547:
Moon landing? Never happened! Come on, NASA. Admit it. The bloody world was already knew.

登月？從未發(fā)生過！來吧，NASA，承認(rèn)吧。全世界早就知道了。

@stephenvanschoick6828:
Perhaps it's time for a new front image. Bill Nelson left administration in January.

也許是時(shí)候換個(gè)新的面貌了。比爾·尼爾森在一月已經(jīng)離開了管理層。

@thatyoudliketoknow1628:
Go china

加油，中國！

@imbalancedstatus8824:
I doubt they just realized that... maybe they are just publicly admitting it.

我懷疑他們才剛意識(shí)到這一點(diǎn)……也許他們只是公開承認(rèn)了。

@petergorian535:
Love the narrative ...............China in competition with the USA??????????????  Really......................  there is no competition

喜歡這個(gè)敘事……中國和美國在競爭？？？？？？？？？真的嗎……根本沒有競爭。

@erikjvanderveen:
You are right. The Chinese are much further than US in many aspects.

你說得對，中國在許多方面比美國走得更遠(yuǎn)。

@yu-jd5jg:
Is the Hegemonic US going to sanction space for allowing China to venture deeply into space?

霸權(quán)主義的美國會(huì)因?yàn)樵试S中國深度探索太空而對太空實(shí)施制裁嗎？

@1manband834:
China the boss

中國是老大。

@LeonLKC:
Is the U.S. able to land its astronauts earlier than China? On whom would you place your bet?

美國能比中國更早把宇航員送上月球嗎？你會(huì)把賭注押在哪一方？

@ChenDeHan:
The US NASA keeps a secret that all of us don't know. They are building a spacecraft that can land on the Sun, that's what the US wants to show to the world.

美國NASA保守著我們都不知道的秘密。他們正在建造一艘可以降落到太陽的航天器，這就是美國想要展示給世界的。

@BartandRoxanne:
China is Learning from the USA. I am glad they are doing well.

中國在向美國學(xué)習(xí)。我很高興他們做得很好。

@Anonymous------:
China learns space technologies from Russia. U5A can't build its own space station.

中國從俄羅斯學(xué)習(xí)太空技術(shù)。美國無法建設(shè)自己的空間站。

@gengwanwong8783:
You must be in a coma then.

那你一定是在昏迷中。

@erikjvanderveen:
I don't like that you seem to be recycling your episodes.. this episode seems to be from 2022. And I had heard all of this then... Please, either create new content or make clear in the title that it is a repost. If I run into this more often I will unsubscribe.

我不喜歡你似乎在重復(fù)播送舊內(nèi)容，這一集看起來像是2022年的。我那時(shí)就聽過這些內(nèi)容……請你要么創(chuàng)造新的內(nèi)容，要么在標(biāo)題中明確說明這是轉(zhuǎn)發(fā)的。如果我經(jīng)常遇到這種情況，我會(huì)取消訂閱。

@NathanZar:
Why the USA has not returned to the moon? Why other countries have not been there?

為什么美國沒有重返月球？為什么其他國家也沒有去過那里？

@willdsm08:
Unfortunately, Musk is so concentrated on Mars that Earth orbit and the Moon have lost all meaning to him. China will take what it wants, and Mars will be left all alone with nowhere to go.

不幸的是，馬斯克如此專注于火星，以至于地球軌道和月球?qū)λ允チ巳魏我饬x。中國將拿走它想要的，而火星將孤單一人，無處可去。

@stevenburns704:
Why does everything have to be about winning, being first, beating your chest I'm number 1  ??? This thinking is a weakness & leads to risks and mistakes. First to the north pole, first to the south pole, first satellite, man on the moon, first this, first that..........and now it doesn't matter, it made no difference. One upmanship & vanity is a weakness not a strength no matter what side of the pacific you're living on.

為什么一切都必須關(guān)乎贏得勝利、成為第一個(gè)、拍胸脯說“我是第一”？這種思維是一種弱點(diǎn)，會(huì)導(dǎo)致風(fēng)險(xiǎn)和錯(cuò)誤。北極第一個(gè)、南極第一個(gè)、第一顆衛(wèi)星、登月第一、第一這個(gè)、第一那個(gè)……但現(xiàn)在這些都無關(guān)緊要，毫無區(qū)別。爭強(qiáng)好勝和虛榮是一種弱點(diǎn)，不是力量，無論你生活在太平洋的哪一邊。

@erikjvanderveen:
Yeah, It seems the US likes Chinese progress not as much as Chinese food.

是的，似乎美國不如喜歡中國進(jìn)步，更喜歡中國食物。

@jennyohara4011:
What I.Q DO you need, to know China is way ahead of the USA in everything, let alone the space program?

你需要多高的智商，才能知道中國在各方面都遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)領(lǐng)先于美國，更不用說太空項(xiàng)目了？

@jason-us8pc:
YOUR NARRATIVE BEHIND TIME, SPACE X IS DIVORCING FROM NASA

你的敘述已經(jīng)落后，SpaceX 正在與NASA脫離關(guān)系。

@MichaelDb-uq9dn:
How did our astronauts deal with the Van Allen belt? I have 20 more questions after that but let’s start there

我們的宇航員是如何應(yīng)對范·艾倫輻射帶的？之后我還有20個(gè)問題，但我們先從這個(gè)問題開始。

@colonbina1:
Apollo astronauts zipped through the Van Allen belts in hours, using shielded spacecraft (aluminum hulls, thermal blankets) and low-exposure trajectories. Dose: \\\\~1-2 rem, safe. Next question?

阿波羅宇航員在數(shù)小時(shí)內(nèi)穿越了范·艾倫輻射帶，使用了屏蔽輻射的航天器（鋁制外殼、屏蔽罩）和低暴露的飛行軌跡。輻射劑量約為1-2倫琴，安全。下一個(gè)問題？

@nlee8801:
India can ask how to land on the moon from NASA.

印度可以向NASA請教如何登月。

@hagankeys3610:
Billion of Indians still to have toilets here on Earth.

數(shù)十億印度人仍然沒有廁所。

@cam35mm:
coping r u

你在應(yīng)付嗎？

@EddyKorgo:
China's space program isn't powerful. They just don't have any restrictions like US have. No safety, no budget limits. That's the only reason what allowed China to accelerate SO MUCH. Plus Chinese engineers are very talented if not more talented than NASA engineers because NASA has years and years of experience where China is very young in this department and achieved all that NASA achieved in 50 years just in a few years only because China has a clear goal where NASA is just a job contractor. China has already put NASA to shame but not because China is better but because NASA is incompetent and too scared and limited by government, bad decision, lobbying and no radical ideas of developing new technology, instead sticking to 50 years old technologies (but not surprising because the way NASA operates would took another 50 years to prove that technology just ON A PAPER). Imagine SpaceX was a Russian company or even better a Chinese one.

中國的太空計(jì)劃并不強(qiáng)大。他們沒有像美國那樣的各種限制。沒有安全限制，沒有預(yù)算限制。正是這一點(diǎn)讓中國能夠加速發(fā)展。而且，中國工程師非常有才華，如果說他們不如NASA的工程師，那也是因?yàn)镹ASA有多年經(jīng)驗(yàn)，而中國在這一領(lǐng)域還很年輕，僅僅在短短幾年里就取得了NASA50年里取得的成就，因?yàn)橹袊忻鞔_的目標(biāo)，而NASA只不過是一個(gè)承包商。

中國已經(jīng)讓NASA蒙羞，但不是因?yàn)橹袊鼜?qiáng)，而是因?yàn)镹ASA無能、過于膽怯、受到政府、糟糕決策、游說和缺乏激進(jìn)新技術(shù)發(fā)展的限制，而堅(jiān)持50年前的技術(shù)（但這也不奇怪，因?yàn)镹ASA的運(yùn)作方式要再過50年才能證明它們的技術(shù)僅僅是紙上的技術(shù)）。想象一下，如果SpaceX是俄羅斯公司，或者是中國公司會(huì)更好。

@colonbina1:
True. China government is investing heavily on space.

沒錯(cuò)。中國政府正在大力投資太空。

@EddyKorgo:
@barongerhardt rice is great space food. it doesn't spoil, easy to cook, its healthy and goes with everything. sweet, spicy, salty, sour whatever you want. lol

大米是很好的太空食物。它不會(huì)變質(zhì)，易于烹飪，健康，且適合任何菜肴。無論是甜的、辣的、咸的、酸的，任何口味都可以。哈哈。

@michaeldemarco9950:
You’re only half correct. China has advanced so far, so fast, because overall, the world is more advanced than it was in the 1960-70-80s.

你說對了一半。中國進(jìn)展如此之快，因?yàn)檎w而言，世界已經(jīng)比1960-70-80年代更先進(jìn)了。

@Casee-v2t:
You wish bud

你希望是吧。

@user83737282:
@michaeldemarco9950 You have no idea how large the industrial scale and various factories, research institutions, as well as countless tiny breakthroughs and support from all sectors of society are involved in the rocket launches you see on the surface. These achievements cannot be made overnight; everyone is just working on the existing accumulation.

你根本不知道你看到的火箭發(fā)射背后，涉及到多么龐大的工業(yè)規(guī)模、各種工廠、研究機(jī)構(gòu)，以及無數(shù)的細(xì)小突破和社會(huì)各界的支持。這些成就不是一夜之間就能完成的，每個(gè)人都在現(xiàn)有的積累上工作。

@JLDaDragon:
No beautiful fireball like the Challenger? Is that's what you mean?

沒有像挑戰(zhàn)者號(hào)那樣美麗的火球？你是這個(gè)意思嗎？

@BSnicks:
Plz enlighten me about safety. Also, tell me about the safety precautions NASA took before they sent Suni and Butch to the ISS. Don't play the blame game and trash Boeing. Without NASA's permission, Boeing would not have been allowed to do anything.

請告訴我一些關(guān)于安全的知識(shí)。此外，告訴我NASA在將Suni和Butch送上國際空間站之前采取了哪些安全措施。不要只會(huì)推卸責(zé)任、抨擊波音。沒有NASA的許可，波音根本不可能做任何事情。

@kristoffereberius2476:
What BS, no safety. These are just cheap poor Whiteman propaganda talking points. Go fly off in challenger or any other US failed rocket launches.

什么鬼，沒安全措施。這些只是便宜的、貧窮的白人宣傳口號(hào)。去挑戰(zhàn)者號(hào)或其他美國失敗的火箭發(fā)射中去吧。

@ankHank-fs1zr:
At this moment, NASA is still ahead for its accomplishments on: + Mars + Space Telescope + Deep space ventures

目前，NASA在以下方面仍然領(lǐng)先：+ 火星 + 太空望遠(yuǎn)鏡 + 深空探測